There are a plethora of powerful tools available to gauge employee feedback. In this guide, we'll touch on the basics of the some of the most popular forms of feedback utilized by people managers and HR teams to ensure they have a pulse on the organization.
Feedback surveys are a powerful tool utilized by organizations to gauge the overall job satisfaction of their employees, and to gather insights into their experiences, perceptions, and suggestions for improvement. They're probably the most popular mechanism to measure ongoing feedback. These surveys can encompass a range of questions about the work environment, management effectiveness, available resources, and overall job satisfaction of an employee base in a relatively efficient manner. The obtained data offers a valuable perspective on the organization's strengths, areas for improvement, and helps in making informed decisions aimed at enhancing employee satisfaction and productivity. A significant portion of this guide will be focused on surveys.
While it's important to frequently touch base with employees and gather their feedback to monitor and improve the work environment, there's a potential pitfall to be aware of: over-surveying. Organizations may be tempted to conduct frequent surveys in an effort to stay constantly updated on collective employee sentiment. However, frequent surveying can lead to "survey fatigue." Employees become exhausted or annoyed by constant requests for feedback, which can lead to lower response rates, rushed or careless responses, and even employee disengagement. Therefore, it's crucial to strike a balance in survey frequency to ensure that feedback is accurate, authentic, and actionable. Because of this, we'll touch on other effective mechanisms for feedback.
But first, lets start with employee feedback surveys, example questions and templates.
Employee satisfaction surveys measure how satisfied employees are with their job, management, and the workplace environment. They often include questions about job roles, working conditions, and company culture.
If you have no satisfaction measure (or engagement survey) in place and want to test the waters, the eNPS methodology is a simple starting point. An employee NPS (Net Promoter Score) or eNPS (Employee Net Promoter Score) is a metric used to measure the level of engagement and satisfaction of a group. It's a single question survey that asks employees a variation of the following question:
On a scale of 1-10, rate your likelihood to recommend your employer to others.
Those that respond 9-10 are considered 'promoters' (+1 pt), 7-8 are considered 'neutrals' (0 pt), and anyone 1-6 are 'detractors' (-1 pt). Add the points for promoters, neutrals, and detractors and you can quickly see if you have more promoters than not. It's an easy way to get a regular pulse on engagement and satisfaction without requiring a tremendous amount from the employees. In most formats, those that answer in the neutral or detractor range
An example of a simple, but slightly more comprehensive employee satisfaction survey might looks follows:
(Rate the statements from 1-10, with 1 = Strongly Disagree and 10 = Strongly Agree.)
This survey is designed to cover key areas impacting employee satisfaction, providing a comprehensive picture of the employee experience, and allow for qualitative measurement and trending. Regular implementation of this survey can assist HR professionals and people managers in tracking trends, identifying areas of concern, and formulating action plans to boost overall employee satisfaction.
Pulse surveys are short, frequent surveys that give a quick insight into the health of a company. They help catch problems early and track trends over time. They're usually a mix of quantitative and qualitative results.
For instance, you could give a weekly pulse survey at the end of the week as follows:
(Rate the statements from 1-10, with 1 = Strongly Disagree and 10 = Strongly Agree.)
This pulse survey is a simple tool to keep a regular check on the overall health of the organization from an employee perspective. The responses can provide valuable insights into workload, communication, collaboration, and overall well-being trends within the company, allowing for proactive response to evolving issues.
Although there is overlap with employee satisfaction, employee engagement surveys have a slightly different purpose. Employee engagement is the level of emotional investment and attachment that an employee has towards their work, their organization, and their colleagues. Engagement surveys assess how emotionally committed employees are to the organization and its goals. They typically include questions about motivation, alignment with company values, and the employee's willingness to go the extra mile.
An example of a simple employee engagement survey might looks follows:
(Rate the statements from 1-10, with 1 = Strongly Disagree and 10 = Strongly Agree.)
This survey is a basic example that allows for the qualitative measure of employee engagement. Regular implementation of this questionnaire can assist HR professionals and people managers in identifying areas that need attention, understanding trends, and creating strategies to foster a more engaged workforce.
If you're looking for more on employee engagement best practices, check out our guide. Here are a couple of methodologies we dive into there.
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) is a comprehensive and well-respected method for measuring employee engagement. Developed by researchers at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, the UWES consists of 17 items in full (originally having 24, short form using only 9) used to evaluate work engagement among employees. The items measure three dimensions of work engagement: vigor, dedication, and absorption.
To give you a sense of the system, here are the items that are rated in the short form version:
These are then scored on a scale from 0 - 6 (Never -> Every Day) representing the frequency at which you have that feeling at work. It does require some expertise to interpret results accurately.
The Job Engagement Scale (JES) was also based on psychology research by William Kahn in 1990 and developed by Bruce Rich into an 18-item scale used to measure job engagement. Even further simplification from some of the same researchers in 2021 led to a 9-item scale that is well adopted. To give you an idea of the system, here are the items rated:
You use a 1 - 5 (Strongly Disagree -> Strongly Agree) scale to rate each of these dimensions.
Performance review questionnaires are a key part of the feedback process for most companies, specifically employee performance feedback. They provide a structured format for assessing an employee's job performance, usually from at least from the perspective of the employee (self-assessment) and manager (employee review). This type of survey typically includes questions pertaining to the employee's duties, goals, achievements, key strengths, and areas for improvement.
The purpose of a performance review questionnaire is two fold. Firstly, it provides a platform for managers to communicate their expectations and evaluate how well an employee is meeting these expectations. Secondly, it offers employees an opportunity to share their own perceptions of their performance, express their career aspirations, and discuss any concerns or suggestions they might have.
The information gathered from performance review questionnaires can serve as a valuable source of feedback for the organization. By identifying trends in employee performance, management can gain insights into the effectiveness of their leadership and business strategies. It also enables the organization to recognize and reward high-performing employees, while identifying areas where additional training or resources might be needed to support employee development and productivity.
This comprehensive approach gathers feedback from an employee's peers, subordinates, supervisors, and occasionally customers. The goal is to get a holistic view of an employee's performance. While not specifically intended for soliciting employee feedback about the organization, the responses frequently include valuable insights regarding the organization and work environment.
Of course, there are also onboarding surveys, exit surveys, training and development surveys, workplace culture surveys, and many others that could provide an angle of employee feedback. Each type of survey has a specific purpose and can provide valuable insights into different areas of the organization. Choosing the right ones to implement depends on the company's objectives and the information they aim to gather.
The effectiveness of these surveys relies on asking the right questions, maintaining anonymity (where appropriate), and acting on the feedback received. Each type of survey has a specific purpose and has potential to provide valuable insights into different areas of the organization. Choosing the right surveys to implement depends on the company's objectives and the information they aim to gather.
Regardless of the type (or types) of surveys you implement, make sure they follow some standard best practices.
Employees are generally more likely to provide honest feedback when they know their responses are anonymous. The more sensitive the question, the more likely anonymity makes sense. This is a judgement call that depends on company culture, industry, and plenty of additional factors.
Avoid the use of industry jargon or complicated language. Keep questions clear, concise, and easy to understand. Don't make someone jump through mental hoops to pick numbers off of a scale.
Ensure that you inform employees of the survey results and any actions the organization will take as a result of the survey. The worst type of survey is one that results in no action.
You have a variety of methodologies to choose from when gathering employee feedback. It's not wise to rely on a singular methodology or type of employee feedback. Some of the most popular, non-survey mechanisms for employee feedback include:
Focus groups are a great way to gain in-depth insights into employee attitudes and perceptions. You can gather a group of employees into a meeting room and facilitate a discussion around a specific topic.
At large organizations, this can provide benefit beyond just feedback. Focus groups with a diverse skillset or job-set learn more about the organization as a whole and all of the parts. New connections can be created across the organization that wouldn't have had a chance of forming in the natural flow of work. It's a time commitment to coordinate regular employee focus groups, but can be well worth the investment.
One-on-one interviews provide a way to gather feedback that is more personal and in-depth than surveys or focus groups. This method is best suited for smaller teams, where it is easier to manage the interviewing process. Often times, a centralized team in Operations or HR will take on the heavy lift of organizing and scheduling one-on-one interviews.
One-on-one interviews provide an unparalleled level of depth and personal connection in the feedback process that other methodologies might not offer. Unlike surveys or focus groups, these interviews provide a private, non-judgemental space for employees to voice their opinions, ideas, or concerns without fear of being overshadowed by the loudest voice in the room or having their responses diluted in a sea of anonymous feedback.
The interviewer has the opportunity to explore topics in detail, ask follow-up questions, and clarify any ambiguous responses, which can lead to richer, more nuanced insights. Moreover, the personal interaction establishes rapport and trust, demonstrating to employees that their feedback is valued and taken seriously. This can boost employee confidence in the feedback process and encourage greater honesty and openness in their responses. It's a large time commitment, but can make sense in certain environments.
Suggestion boxes, or their modern equivalent, anonymous online feedback platforms, are time-honored tools for collecting employee feedback. Despite the availability of more technologically sophisticated methods, they remain relevant in today's workplace for several reasons.
Firstly, they provide an avenue for employees to share their ideas, thoughts, or concerns without fear of possible repercussions, promoting a culture of openness and transparency. This is particularly beneficial in environments where employees may be hesitant to voice criticisms or innovative ideas due to a fear of judgment or backlash.
Secondly, these tools can enable organizations to tap into a wealth of untapped knowledge and ideas. Given their anonymity, employees from all levels of the organization are likely to participate, providing a diverse range of perspectives that might not be captured through other feedback mechanisms.
To utilize suggestion boxes or anonymous online feedback platforms effectively, it's crucial to ensure they are easily accessible and regularly monitored. Make clear to employees that their suggestions will be reviewed and considered, and communicate any changes made as a result of their feedback. This reinforces that their input is valued and can encourage ongoing participation.
Employee Advisory Boards (EABs) are another effective mechanism to solicit and respond to employee feedback. An EAB typically consists of a cross-sectional group of employees who represent the diverse interests of the workforce. They act as a conduit between the employee base and management, sharing ideas, concerns, and suggestions for improvement.
The EAB can be an invaluable tool for fostering open dialogue within an organization. By meeting regularly with management, the EAB is able to present a collective voice of the employee base, ensuring all perspectives are considered in decision-making processes. This can lead to more informed and inclusive decisions that reflect the breadth of employee experiences and needs.
Moreover, EABs can be instrumental in facilitating responsive action to employee feedback. When employees see their suggestions and concerns being addressed directly through the interventions advocated by the EAB, it instills a sense of being heard and valued. This can boost morale, encourage further feedback, and strengthen overall employee engagement.
To maximize the effectiveness of an EAB, it's crucial that the board is representative of the workforce and that it operates in an environment of transparency and trust. Clear communication of EAB activities, outcomes, and changes resulting from their discussions can reinforce the board's role and its contribution to organizational improvement.
Town Hall Meetings, where entire teams, departments, or even organizations gather to discuss broader issues, are a wonderful platform for obtaining employee feedback. They not only provide a forum for company-wide updates or strategic communication but also create an open environment where employees from various levels can voice their ideas, opinions, and concerns directly to the leadership.
To ensure town hall meetings are effective, some best practices include:
When effectively conducted, town hall meetings can lead to meaningful exchanges of ideas, foster a sense of community, and help build transparency in the organization. They also provide an opportunity for leadership to demonstrate their commitment to openness and employee engagement.
Gathering employee feedback is essential for creating a positive work environment, improving employee engagement and satisfaction, and increasing employee retention rates. By utilizing the best methodologies, crafting the right questions and using templates to jumpstart the process, you'll be well on your way to conducting effective employee feedback programs. Remember to follow best practices throughout the process, and keep employees informed of results and outcomes. By taking these steps, you'll be better equipped to create a workplace that fosters employee success, growth, and happiness.
.png){kind=small}
The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.
A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!
Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.
.png){kind=small}
